Azam puyazade; Ahmad Ghahramani
Volume 3, Issue 3 , December 2019, , Pages 1-18
Abstract
By explaining the basic structures of the commentary tradition, Norman Calder has analyzed this tradition from Tabari to Ibn Kathir. Using those kinds of hermeneutic approaches, he believes that the text itself is meaningless and meaningless, he considers the text of the Qur'an meaningful when placed ...
Read More
By explaining the basic structures of the commentary tradition, Norman Calder has analyzed this tradition from Tabari to Ibn Kathir. Using those kinds of hermeneutic approaches, he believes that the text itself is meaningless and meaningless, he considers the text of the Qur'an meaningful when placed alongside structures outside the text that exist independently. Calder proposes three structural features for the literary type of commentary over this period of time, and concludes that Cordial commentary is the best criterion that the tradition of interpretation could achieve. The present study, by critiquing Calder's analysis and concluding it, shows that he has overlooked and misinterpreted points of view and has positioned each interpreter to fit the exegetical and exemplary character of his scholarly personality. Not considered. This critical-analytic study shows that Cordoba is under the umbrella of consensus, as is the case with other interpreters, and must weigh each interpreter in his or her discipline, taking into account the prerequisites that the interpreter has identified as his or her own. Evaluated
